A district judge initially dismissed the case, citing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which shields online platforms from liability for content posted on their sites.
A family sued TikTok alleging a 10-year-old died due to a "blackout challenge" seen on her FYP. If the case goes to SCOTUS it ...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is probably anything but decent. The clause insulates social media (SM) from liability when hosting third-party content – even if dangerous or offensive - ...
Anderson v. TikTok sets new parameters for the liability of social media under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, ...
Social-media companies flourished under the protection of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which states ...
A US government lawsuit accusing eBay of selling almost 350,000 polluting and environmentally harmful products — including ...
Meta Platforms Inc. must continue to defend against Nevada’s claims that users under 18 were harmed when the social media ...
Survivors of the Charleston massacre are asking the Fourth Circuit to rethink precedent around Section 230 of the ...
Bay Inc. EBAY shares are trading lower on Tuesday. The company successfully won the dismissal of a U.S. Environmental ...
District Judge Orelia Merchant ruled that eBay isn’t liable for items that users sell on the digital marketplace due to civil protections that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback